Quit Using Auto White Balance

White Balance Fixed 50mm, f/1.4, 1/160s

Ever since taking Raul Touzon’s workshop I almost never shoot using auto white balance (AWB).  The camera rarely gets the white balance correct when it guesses, and the photos from a single shoot are often inconsistent in color when they are shot with AWB.  If they are going to be “wrong” when AWB is used, you might as well guess wrong yourself by choosing one of the manual white balance modes — at least the images will be consistent with each other.

Ideally one would shoot an image of a gray card (or a similar type of product) which has a known color and use it either to set a custom white balance in the camera or to sample it in software to do an automatic adjustment.  If I don’t use a gray card, I pick a WB mode (my default is “daylight”) and shoot everything with that.  In Lightroom I either sample a white point to fix up the WB or I adjust it to taste (I might even want to make it wacky here and there).

The shot above was snapped in the kitchen while I was testing my newly-repaired camper.  Canon had changed all my default settings of course and I don’t even remember what WB was set in the camera.  No matter, I simply used the WB eye dropper to sample one of the white polka dots on my daughter’s dress.  The image above is the result — straight out of the camera except for the white balance.

White Balance Settings In Lightroom

Original image:

Original Image

Advertisements

12 responses

  1. If you shoot in RAW, in doesn’t actually matter because the white balance is not locked in. So I just leave on auto and fix/adjust in Lightroom.

    July 27, 2012 at 2:52 pm

    • Oh yes — you’re absolutely correct and I always shoot in RAW except occasionally when shooting sports (buffer can’t always keep up). However, if you are shooting a scene with odd or changing light it brings consistency to what you see on the LCD from shot-to-shot. Some examples: I was doing some shots of my daughter where she was lit by an orange-ish light and I was lighting the background (a building) with a blue gel on a flash, shot through a railing to cast shadows. AWB really wanted to correct that blue background…couldn’t see at all whether I was getting what I wanted until I switched to manual WB. It also helps in some night situations where the light isn’t constant (traffic signals changing from green to yellow to red for example). Finally I’ve seen variations when shooting a panorama across the horizon — manual WB gives a consistent set of images to evaluate in-camera. But as you said, it can ultimately just be adjusted in post.

      July 27, 2012 at 6:57 pm

  2. Excellent point. I long for a camera, though, that just has a simple Kelvin dial (cooler > warmer). I prefer the daytime inside, and then cloud outside. What I love about RAW is that once you correct one in a recent series, considering conditions weren’t too dynamic, then you can paste the correction to a whole batch.

    July 29, 2012 at 12:55 pm

    • RAW — and the ability to sync the same correction across multiple photos — is my friend!

      August 8, 2012 at 8:31 pm

  3. I say to get your AWB fixed. Mine on my Canon Rebel XSi and Canon 550D work superbly!

    August 6, 2012 at 12:40 am

    • Really? All the time in every lighting situation? Hmmm…I have to say that I’m skeptical. I believe you in the sense that you may be happy with it, but not that it’s “correct” all the time.

      I shoot both a 50D and 5D mkii (fresh from a full factory cleanup/checkup so supposedly there’s no fixing needed) and there are plently of scenarios (mixed-lighting in particular) which need adjustment. None of these would be handled “correctly” by AWB: http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaeltuuk/6163278344/in/set-72157623068885347 (strobe with some tungsten ambient and blue background), http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaeltuuk/6289300892/in/set-72157623068885347 (strobe with a *very* red floor reflecting a lot of red light), and so on. Apparently I’ve never posted this portrait online (at least I can’t find a link) but another example I have is a portrait where the subject is lit with a 1/4 (might have been 1/2) CTO gel and I lit the background with a blue-geled strobe shining through some railings to create shadows. AWB saw that blue and turned it completely neutral…exactly the opposite of what I wanted and I couldn’t figure it out for a bit. My friend pointed out that AWB was screwing me up. Even in a house which has varying color temperatures — pictures taken from different directions may vary.

      August 8, 2012 at 8:30 pm

      • The only time I’ve ever had a problem with AWB is when it’s not on AWB, i.e., when I set it for something else. I’ve learned to leave it on AWB.

        August 8, 2012 at 8:47 pm

      • So I take it you never adjust white balance in post (since AWB always works)?

        August 11, 2012 at 12:31 am

      • The only time I have to adjust white balance is when I take it off AWB. I usually do that when I’m playing around with settings, believing that I know better than the camera’s computer. I don’t. That little computer is more powerful than the computers that put man on the moon back in 1969. Thus, I let it do its job.

        August 11, 2012 at 12:41 am

      • We clearly shoot in different situations and have different expectations of the camera. Modern compute power is impressive indeed yet it is still only as good as the input provided to it. The camera simply cannot know when I want a huge blue wall neutralized or when I’m intentionally flooding the scene with blue light and want it to appear that way in the final digital image. Therefore, I override the camera — I *do* know better than the camera’s computer — via setting the WB in-camera and/or in post. For the same reason I don’t leave my camera in Auto or Program modes. As smart as that camera is, I’m not necessarily going to let it choose my shutter speed and aperture because it doesn’t have the necessary information to make that choice.

        August 11, 2012 at 5:36 am

  4. Great post Michael, I always shoot in AWB but I always shoot RAW as well, i’d rather fix in post that take time to fiddle shooting but that’s just me, whatever works.

    August 10, 2012 at 10:20 am

    • I don’t actually mess with it much at all — almost always keep it in daylight except in heavy tungsten lighting. That allows me to see consistent results during a given shooting situation. I still tweak in post of course.

      August 11, 2012 at 12:26 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s